Owners & Developers
Your Contracts Push Liability to the GC, but Your Name Is Still in the Headline.
When you take advantage of artificial intelligence to manage risk and compliance, you can be confident that everyone on your projects is safe, compliant, and productive, so you can reduce risk and increase profits.
Trusted by Leading Companies
If This Sounds Familiar
- You’ve got active projects across the country, each with its own GC, its own subs, and its own safety culture.
- You pushed safety responsibility into the contract.
- You don’t have a field team of your own to check it.
- You only hear what happened on a project last month, not what’s happening on it this week.
That’s not a safety program. That’s a monthly report and a guess.
You've Pushed Liability to the GC. You Haven't Pushed Away the Exposure.
Multi-hundred-page contracts are supposed to put safety squarely on your general contractor. On paper, that’s exactly what happens. In practice, the exposure doesn’t move nearly as much as the contract implies.
If you’re running an owner-controlled insurance program, you’re personally on the hook for the first $250,000 to $500,000 of every incident before insurance kicks in. That’s not the GC’s deductible, it’s yours.
When a contractor’s employee is injured and accepts workers’ compensation, they can’t sue their employer. They can sue you. The contract pushes liability to the GC, but that protection is incomplete and it won’t stop a claim from naming you directly.
When something serious happens on one of your projects, your name is the one that shows up in the press. Not your GC’s. The biggest brand on the project absorbs the public exposure, whether or not it’s the named responsible party in the contract.
Underneath all of it, you’re relying on your GCs to manage safety and send you a report. No real-time visibility. No consistent data from one project to the next. No way to see a problem developing before it becomes an incident.
You’ve pushed liability to the GC. You haven’t pushed away the exposure.
What a Preventable Incident Actually Costs You
It’s rarely the injury itself that produces the catastrophic loss. It’s everything downstream: damaged equipment with a six-month lead time to replace, a trade sequence that has to start over, liquidated damages for every day the schedule slips.
On a fast-track, schedule-driven build, a single communication failure between two trades can generate more than $100 million in losses — independent of anyone getting hurt.
Construction has a name for the pattern that creates most of this risk: trade stacking. Too many crews working the same footprint on a compressed schedule means less oversight per square foot, and more chances for the failure nobody saw coming until it already happened.
Here's Where That Changes
Safety Mojo gives you one place to see how every project, every GC, and every sub in your network is actually performing. And it’s built from the field data your network is already generating, not compiled into a report after the fact.
You see progress, safety performance, and emerging risk across your entire portfolio, with the ability to drill into any project, contractor, or trade the moment something needs your attention.
Traditional pre-qualification tells you who a contractor was. Safety Mojo shows you who they are right now on this project, today.
How It Works
01
Your projects already generate the data.
As GCs and subs submit field observations, pre-task plans, and incident reports, that activity rolls up automatically — no one has to compile it by hand.
02
See your whole portfolio at a glance.
Every project, GC, and sub shows up with a real-time risk picture, not a monthly snapshot.
03
Drill into what needs your attention.
Go from the portfolio down to a single project, a single contractor, or a single trade to see exactly what’s driving the risk.
04
Act on it.
Use the data in contractor review meetings, renewal decisions, and board-level reporting before a problem becomes a missed date.
Safety Mojo’s Flex PTP feature gathers real-time PTP data from the field.
Proof It Works at Portfolio Scale
The Only
mandated globally on a hyperscale data center program
1 of 2
platforms mandated globally by a Fortune 10 oil & gas major
13,000+
field observations collected across one owner’s project network in two years
One national logistics and industrial developer rolled out Safety Mojo across multiple business units with no existing safety technology in place. Two years and 13,000-plus observations later, they’re using that data to identify underperforming contractors and remove them from the network before they cause a problem, not after.
They went from zero safety infrastructure to a fully data-driven accountability model.
Why This Beats What You're Doing Now
A monthly report tells you what happened last month. A quarterly audit shows you what a contractor wants you to see on audit day. A generic enterprise safety platform needs your contractors to enter their own data, in a format that suits the software, which means you’re trusting contractors to grade themselves.
Safety Mojo’s data comes from the field, in real time, from the forms crews are already filling out. It isn’t a report your contractors build for you. It’s what’s actually happening, as it happens.
Turn Your Safety Program Into a Data-Driven Story for the Board
You already know which of your contractors you trust and which ones worry you. The difference is whether you have the data to prove it — to your board, to your insurer, and to yourself, before the next incident forces the conversation.
